|AOL and CS Department?
||[May. 13th, 2001|01:04 pm]
Some dude in my CS class just sent a message to the class mailing list saying he doesn't have a group to work with on our next project and he "really" needs one please. If that weren't pathetic and funny enough, his email address was @aol.com ... umm... yeah. You're really going to find a group when your email address says right away how technically competent you are. I don't want to hear any excuses .... if he was a friends' or his parents' house, he could've putty'ed in to the CS cluster and used his @cs email account.|
In other news, still hackin'. Secret project is feature complete now... just writing plugins now. Working with revjim on getting the new server up and running, too. (btw, you can do that like <lj user=revjim> ... but that's not the new feature)
ooh i'll have to remember that
i like that new feature ;) although, you'll i'm sure have to remind me several times paige, so be prepared! :)
I do too in certain cases. I dunno.. I mean I don't refer to rob as iceberg usually, but yeah, it's pretty neat i must admit.. like in your case it'll work perfectly.. caren caren! :)
2001-05-13 01:31 pm (UTC)
hmm ... do I hear "LJ Tag FAQ" ?
that is a DAMN FINE feature.
only cause it says revjim, huh? :P
that and because typing all the html everytime you want to link to something common (like a journal) is a pain. And that makes it nice and pretty and easy.
and he likes nice and pretty and easy things.
don't expect me to believe you're not talking about women. ;)
u must have some very sad people in your class lol
oh incase u r wondering who i am i am dogcwguys little sister
apparently "that's not the new feature" wasn't entirely clear enough.
Well, it's a new feature, but it's not the new feature.
That IS a good feature. I only just discovered this journal. I don't think about the creators of stuff...all I know is, it's all your fault I'm so damn addicted! ahem...
"Life is just one crusing defeat after another until you just wish Flanders was dead..."
Not to bitch, but should be there be some user validation on this?bradisbiggeek
Probably shouldn't make a link if there is no user with that name. So if there wasn't a user by that username it says "unknown user" or something like that. I don't know if it's a big enough deal or not.
it's supposed to be quick.... we're not tying the HTML cleaner to the database. yuch.