?

Log in

No account? Create an account
Whoa, shit. - brad's life — LiveJournal [entries|archive|friends|userinfo]
Brad Fitzpatrick

[ website | bradfitz.com ]
[ userinfo | livejournal userinfo ]
[ archive | journal archive ]

Whoa, shit. [May. 23rd, 2004|10:23 pm]
Brad Fitzpatrick
Can this administration get any worse?
Rumsfeld bans camera phones in Iraq; digicams and truth in wartime...
http://www.boingboing.net/2004/05/23/rumsfeld_bans_camera.html
http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2004/05/23/1085250873479.html
http://www.mercurynews.com/mld/mercurynews/news/politics/8680807.htm?1c
LinkReply

Comments:
[User Picture]From: jessicka
2004-05-23 10:33 pm (UTC)
Oh, it can always get worse.

(Not that I think that'll pass, but if it did, it would certainly be worse.)
(Reply) (Thread)
[User Picture]From: weh
2004-05-23 10:38 pm (UTC)
That's a Democratic bill, not one from the Bush administration. The last thing our professionalized army needs at the moment is an influx of unskilled drafted men. The bill is basically an attempt to fuel opposition to the war.
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)
[User Picture]From: brad
2004-05-23 10:41 pm (UTC)
Haha... awesome.
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)
[User Picture]From: toast0
2004-05-23 11:27 pm (UTC)
There's this one too.

(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)
(Deleted comment)
[User Picture]From: denshi
2004-05-24 08:34 am (UTC)

'it can always get worse' is kind of fun to say

(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)
[User Picture]From: koehlerk
2004-05-23 10:55 pm (UTC)
Do you have your voter registration card? I sure do!
(Reply) (Thread)
[User Picture]From: mcfnord
2004-05-24 09:40 am (UTC)
I had mine but these important looking people came and took it away. They looked important so I didn't argue.
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)
From: everdred
2004-05-25 05:07 pm (UTC)
As do I. But, believe it or not, some do not.

Therefore, I've been trying to spread this.
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)
From: verticale
2004-05-24 03:07 am (UTC)
Oh you have got to be kidding me. I mean, I know you're not, but jesus.
(Reply) (Thread)
[User Picture]From: adudeabides
2004-05-31 08:09 am (UTC)
I find this disturbingly worse: http://www.livejournal.com/community/photobasics/3685.html

Not only does it further lessen the responsibility of parents for their children, it allows them to sue for any entertainment-product they consider "harmful" for their children - providing them with a minimum of $10,000 in compensatory damages - it soundly tramples First Amendment rights.

Entertainment products...TV, film, books, photography, art, magazines, etc.
(Reply) (Thread)