Brad Fitzpatrick (brad) wrote,
Brad Fitzpatrick
brad

DVD ripping

I realized having all my DVDs (some ~250) ripped and available on the network from any computer/TV is very feasible.

I'm using vobcopy with --mirror, no transcoding. Then I can still have bonus features and menus and all that. VideoLAN is cool in that it can play a VIDEO_TS directory directly, as if it were a raw DVD.

I'm starting to run out of space on my 250GB RAID-1. I have room for another two disks in my current machine, so probably 800GB. Plus I need another SATA card, since this motherboard only has two ports.

If I want to do this right, it's $3573.00 for another machine with eight 400GB disks, 3.2TB. But I think ripping just our most-watched movies will be cool enough for now.

My current machine has room for 5 disks. Currently it's:

IDE (boot)
250GB SATA (raid 1)
250GB SATA (raid 1)
[empty]
[empty]

Assuming I don't want to mess with my current RAID-1 (my $HOME, etc), I have two choices:

1) 2x 400GB SATA RAID-1.
2) replace the IDE disk with another 400GB SATA disk and do a RAID-5 over three disks. Then I'd have 800GB new, not 400GB. Just gotta look into current state of grub/lilo and software RAIDs.

Total logical capacity needed, I'm guessing:

250 discs * average 5.5 GB = 1.3T

But if only 66% are worth ripping = 916 GB ...

So with 800 GB new, that's just 116 GB on my RAID-1 I'd need to use, which is fine. I'm not using the whole 250 GB anyway. (kept large chunks unpartitioned for testing stuff)

If I wanted to watch my movies remotely (say, from a hotel room with net access...), how much CPU/bandwidth would I need to do real-time transcoding?
Tags: dvd, project, storage, tech
Subscribe
  • Post a new comment

    Error

    default userpic

    Your reply will be screened

    Your IP address will be recorded 

    When you submit the form an invisible reCAPTCHA check will be performed.
    You must follow the Privacy Policy and Google Terms of use.
  • 23 comments